The first article is stating how Bush has "protected more ocean than any person in history." While he has been protecting large portions of the ocean he has also been putting no effort in stopping global warming. On Salon.com it shows "Bushes seven evironmental deadly sins", so he is both helping the environment but at the same time letting it suffer by global warming. After each "deadly sin" of Bush it states Obama's mission of helping save the earth.
I think that Bush is just trying to get America to like him right before he leaves office, so he's trying to save as much as possible in a small amount of time.
Bush Sin 1: Blew hot air on global warming
Bush Sin 2: Failed to regulate greenhouse gases at home
Bush Sin 3: Failed to develop clean energy sources
Bush Sin 4: Abandoned endangered species
Bush Sin 5: Carved up the American West for oil and gas excavation
Bush Sin 6: Not seeing the forest or the trees
Bush Sin 7: Choked our clean-air standards
1 comment:
Your perspective is more against Bush and that he is using this water habitat zone as a way to get people to like him which also may be true but it is also a push for a better tomorrow and something know one has ever done before so in a sort of way he is a pioneer in the field of protected international water. The evidence she uses shows how Bush did a bad job and how Obama will be a better candidate for the position as president.
Post a Comment